Summary:
It is a well-established fact that the New Testament has been rigorously scrutinized by hundreds of biblical scholars
throughout the ages.
Methodologies known as criticisms, have been applied to reconstruct the original autographs of the New Testament.
In recent centuries, historical and textual criticisms have formed the foundation of all biblical literary inquiries.
Application of these methodologies have produced a high-fidelity reproductions of the original autographs.
Description:
With 24,000 New Testament manuscripts, how can anyone accurately recover the text of the original autographs?
Readers of the New Testament can be assured that the original texts have been recovers with pinpoint accuracy.
This is because hundreds of biblical scholars have applied methodologies know as criticisms to these ancient manuscripts to authenticate and accurately reconstruct the precise words of the original authors.
Today, biblical scholars largely use historical and textual criticisms to authenticate and reconstruct biblical texts.
Types of Biblical Criticism
New Testament manuscripts are examined using all forms of biblical criticism [REF-CRT01].
The major types of biblical criticism are:
Historical Criticism seeks to interpret biblical writings in the context of their historical settings [REF-CRT09].
Textual (Exegetical) Criticism is concerned with establishing the original or most authoritative text [REF-CRT03].
Philological Criticism is the study of the biblical languages for an accurate knowledge of vocabulary, grammar, and style of the period [REF-CRT04].
Literary Criticism focuses on the various literary genres embedded in the text in order to uncover evidence concerning date of composition, authorship, and original function of the various types of writing that constitute the Bible [REF-CRT05].
Tradition Criticism attempts to trace the development of the oral traditions that preceded written texts [REF-CRT06].
Form Criticism classifies the written material according to the preliterary forms, such as parable or hymn [REF-CRT07].
Redaction Criticism studies how the documents were assembled by their final authors and editors [REF-CRT08].
For a more detailed description of each type of biblical criticism consult Encyclopedia Britannica [REF-CRT02].
Application of Historical Criticism
Historical criticism was first developed during the 18th century by German theologians Heinrich Paulus, Rudolf Bultmann and others.
Historical criticism, also known as higher criticism, has to do with the determination of a text's genuineness.
This type of biblical criticism is concerned with the nature of the manuscript as a whole.
This includes the date of the manuscript, its literary style, its structure, its historicity and ultimately authorship [REF-GEI03].
Manuscript dating is performed using two approaches, paleography and mass spectrometer radiocarbon dating.
Together these approaches are used to accurately date biblical texts.
Paleographers assist biblical critics with precisely dating papyri by examining handwriting
and comparing manuscripts to other manuscripts of a known date.
Fortunately, biblical critics and paleographers have a large number of ancient manuscripts at their disposal,
many of which have been found within the last century.
Application of Textual Criticism
Textual criticism was first developed during the 18th and 19th centuries by
both German and English theologians.
Textual criticism fast became the foundation among scholars of all biblical literary inquiries ever since.
Textual criticism, also known as lower criticism,
has to do with the evaluation of a text in an effort to reconstruct the autograph [REF-GRE01].
This type of biblical criticism is concerned with the content of the text itself.
This includes the wording, grammatical form, syntax, spelling, punctuation, etc.
The historicity of the text is also authenticated during the process of Textual Criticism.
Textual critics study variations across all manuscripts to decide whether the differences represent
unintentional orthographic errors (e.g. misspellings, words inadvertently omitted, punctuation errors, minor word transpositions) or
intentional changes involving grammar smoothing or various word/phrase changes.
From the variations of manuscripts, a reconstruction of the original autograph is produced.
Conclusion
It is a well-established fact that the New Testament has been rigorously scrutinized by hundreds of
biblical scholars throughout the ages.
Their formal training and meticulous attention to detail has ensured that the New Testament texts we revere
today are an accurate reconstruction of the original autographs.
Resources:
A Ready Defense - Best of Josh McDowell (REF-JMD01)
Bible Query from NT Manuscripts (REF-QRY01)
Biblical criticism (REF-CRT01)
Form Criticism (REF-CRT07)
From God to Us (REF-GEI03)
Historical Criticism (REF-CRT09)
Introduction to New Testament Textual Criticism (REF-GRE01)
Literary Criticism (REF-CRT05)
New Testament Manuscripts (REF-RFS01)
Philological Criticism (REF-CRT04)
Reasonable Faith - Christian Truth and Apologetics (REF-WLC03)
Redaction Criticism (REF-CRT08)
Textual Criticism (REF-CRT03)
The Critical Study of Biblical Literature: Exegesis and Hermeneutics (REF-CRT02)
Tradition Criticism (REF-CRT06)
×PALEOGRAPHY: Paleography is the study of ancient and historical handwriting. Wikipedia ...
×
Resource ID: REF-WLC03
Resource: Reasonable Faith - Christian Truth and Apologetics
Authors: William Lane Craig
Publisher: Crossway Books
Publish Date: 1984
ISBN 10: 0-89107-764-2
Page: 193-227
×
Resource ID: REF-GRE01
Resource: Introduction to New Testament Textual Criticism